Skip to content
For business

2027 Audi SQ5 Sportback deals in Los Angeles

SUV · AWD · Automatic (AM-S7) · 23 mpg combined

No broker or dealer has posted a 2027 Audi SQ5 Sportback lease or finance offer in Los Angeles yet — below are the Audi dealers that stock the car.

Live offersNone yet
Audi dealers7

Where to buy a 2027 Audi SQ5 Sportback

3

7 Audi dealers in Los Angeles. The three with the highest Score are below.

Map of Audi dealers in Los Angeles
Audi Beverly HillsBeverly Hills · Dealer53/100Score
Call dealer
Audi CalabasasCalabasas · Dealer53/100Score
Call dealer
Audi Downtown LADowntown · Dealer53/100Score
Call dealer
All Audi dealers →

Email me when an Audi SQ5 Sportback lease offer is posted in Los Angeles.

By sending this form you agree to our Terms of Service and our Privacy Policy.

Specs2027 · 3 L · I6 · 23 mpg combShow
3 L · I6Automatic (AM-S7) · AWD21 city · 28 hwy · 23 comb mpg
Fuel
Gasoline · premium
Est. annual fuel
$3,450

Not published for this model: MSRP, cargo volume, passenger volume.

About this model

2027 Audi SQ5 Sportback

This midsize performance SUV suits a household that wants all-weather capability without giving up daily comfort, and it leans toward drivers who cover real highway miles rather than short errands. The 3-liter six-cylinder pairs with all-wheel drive, which matters more in slick conditions or mountain routes than on a dry commute. At 23 combined MPG, a 30-mile freeway commute burns a bit over a gallon of premium gas each way, and the gap between city (21) and highway (28) numbers tells you this SUV rewards steady cruising more than stop-and-go traffic. The seven-speed automatic keeps things straightforward with no gear-hunting complexity to worry about. For someone who values traction and a planted feel over efficiency, this drivetrain and engine combination makes sense. The trade-off is fuel spend: between the premium-only requirement and the city mileage in particular, this is not the choice for a buyer whose priority is minimizing pump visits or long-term running costs.

Compared with