Skip to content
For business

2027 Mercedes-Benz GLC300 deals in Los Angeles

SUV · AWD · RWD · Automatic 9-spd · 26–27 mpg combined

No broker or dealer has posted a 2027 Mercedes-Benz GLC300 lease or finance offer in Los Angeles yet — below are the Mercedes-Benz dealers that stock the car.

Live offersNone yet
Mercedes-Benz dealers7

Where to buy a 2027 Mercedes-Benz GLC300

3

7 Mercedes-Benz dealers in Los Angeles. The three with the highest Score are below.

Map of Mercedes-Benz dealers in Los Angeles
Downtown LA MotorsDowntown · Dealer53/100Score
Call dealer
Keyes EuropeanSherman Oaks · Dealer53/100Score
Call dealer
Mercedes-Benz of Beverly HillsBeverly Hills · Dealer53/100Score
Call dealer
All Mercedes-Benz dealers →

Email me when a Mercedes-Benz GLC300 lease offer is posted in Los Angeles.

By sending this form you agree to our Terms of Service and our Privacy Policy.

Specs2027 · 2 L · I4 · 26–27 mpg combShow
2 L · I4Automatic 9-spd · AWD · RWD23–24 city · 31–32 hwy · 26–27 comb mpg
Fuel
Gasoline · premium
Est. annual fuel
$3,050

Not published for this model: MSRP, cargo volume, passenger volume.

About this model

2027 Mercedes-Benz GLC300

A midsize luxury SUV like this one works best for someone who wants comfortable ground clearance and a quiet cabin without stepping up to a three-row vehicle. Under the hood sits a 2L four-cylinder paired with a 9-speed automatic, offered with either rear-wheel or all-wheel drive. Combined fuel economy lands at 26-27 MPG, with city figures of 23-24 and highway numbers of 31-32. For a household doing a 30-mile round-trip commute mostly on surface streets, that city figure is the more realistic number to plan around, and the gap between city and highway suggests real savings on longer highway stretches. All-wheel drive adds confidence in poor weather but typically costs a bit at the pump compared to the rear-wheel setup, so buyers cross-shopping the two drivetrains should factor that into their long-term fuel budget rather than judging on sticker comparisons alone.

Compared with